|
 | December 19, 2008 | | November 5, 2008 | | October 2, 2008 | | September 2, 2008 | | August 5, 2008 | | July 9, 2008 | | July 3, 2008 | | June 3, 2008 | | May 19, 2008 | | May 9, 2008 | | April 23, 2008 | | March 25, 2008 | | March 17, 2008 | | November 20, 2007 | | November 10, 2007 | | November 10, 2007 | | November 5, 2007 | | October 2, 2007 | | August 13, 2007 | | July 30, 2007 | | July 18, 2007 | | April 9, 2007 | | April 8, 2007 | | March 27, 2007 | | January 12, 2007 | | December 28, 2006 | | December 5, 2006 | | October 5, 2006 | | May 11, 2006 | | March 17, 2005 |
|
|
| TEN REASONS NOT TO USE AN "IN-HOUSE" SHREDDER
1) Reconstruction of Shredded Material - discovering papers not thoroughly shredded in trash cans, bins, dumpsters, etc.
2) OSHA and Potential Fire Hazards - "in-house" shredders are potential fire hazards due to dust build-up, "clogging", etc.
3) Certified vs. Uncertified Destruction - proper shredding techniques (chain-of-command, logging activities, etc.)
4) Witnessed Destruction - destruction of sensitive materials must and should always be witnessed by another party or parties
5) Background Checks - employers typically use hourly personnel to shred "in-house" which most do not require a background check upon employment
6) Disposal - usually thrown away once shredded with regular trash
7) Cost - equipment costs, wages, etc. vs. a shredding company hired to do the shred is much higher in the long run
8) Disgruntled Employees, Former Employees, Infiltrators - they will do whatever they can to harm a former employer or business
9) Security - locked containers only accessible with a key; much more secure than trash cans, dumpsters, etc. which are accessible by all
10) Greatest Defense Against Obstruction of Justice Charges is a Scheduled Shredding Service - Businesses being protective of their sensitive materials helps their liability issues
| |
